![]() ![]() For An R3 type solution, there is no downside to start using one immediately. If you want to stick with a Hans, my recommendation would be not to introduce other risks based on the harness of your choice. ![]() The quick answer to your question is "as soon as safely possible". Both #1 and #2 are SFI approved solutions. Their advantage is that they work with 3-point belts and are very popular with instructors and intermediate/advanced students (in the NE). Plus their specialized strap systems direct forces away from your body in the event of an impact. All Simpson restraints have a low-top design that makes it easier to exit the car. There was a good comparison thread on another track forum recently but, at the moment, the only ones available for sale are from Safety Solutions (bought by Simpson recently). Simpson uses advanced technology and materials to build head and neck restraints that provide racers with maximum protection and comfort. Option #2 would be HNR devices that tether to your body instead of a harness. You can research all of this as the topic has been beaten to death. Not to mention that different clubs have different rules for all the in-between situations and disallow specific configurations. Which brings up the whole 4/5/6-point harness discussion, which brings up the stock vs racing seat discussion which ultimately leads to the risks of doing anything in-between 3-point belts on stock seats and 6-point harnesses on racing seats and a cage. If helmets and long-sleeve shirts are meant for safety, why not a Hans device? Was wondering at what point of an HPDE driver is a Head and Neck Restraint necessary? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |